Reflections on Violence
Georges Sorel
рмЕрмкрнНрм░рнЗрм▓ 2021 ┬╖ Ukemi Audiobooks from W. F. Howes Limited ┬╖ Charles Armstrong рмжрнНрм╡рм╛рм░рм╛ рммрм░рнНрмгрнНрмгрмирм╛ рмХрм░рм╛рмпрм╛рмЗрмЫрм┐
headphones
рмЕрмбрм┐рмУрммрнБрмХрнН
8 рмШ. 41 рморм┐.
рмЕрм╕рмВрмХрнНрм╖рм┐рмкрнНрмд рмЕрмЯрнЗ
family_home
рмпрнЛрмЧрнНрнЯ
info
reportрм░рнЗрмЯрм┐рмВ рмУ рм╕рморнАрмХрнНрм╖рм╛рмЧрнБрнЬрм┐рмХрнБ рмпрм╛рмЮрнНрмЪ рмХрм░рм╛рмпрм╛рмЗрмирм╛рм╣рм┐рмБ ┬армЕрмзрм┐рмХ рмЬрм╛рмгрмирнНрмдрнБ
53 рморм┐.рм░ рмПрмХ рмирморнБрмирм╛ рмЪрм╛рм╣рм╛рмБрмирнНрмдрм┐? рмпрнЗ рмХрнМрмгрм╕рм┐ рм╕рморнЯрм░рнЗ, рмПрмкрм░рм┐рмХрм┐ рмЕрмлрм▓рм╛рмЗрми рмерм┐рммрм╛ рм╕рморнЯрм░рнЗ рмормзрнНрнЯ рм╢рнБрмгрмирнНрмдрнБред┬а
рмпрнЛрнЬрмирнНрмдрнБ
рмПрм╣рм┐ рмЕрмбрм┐рмУрммрнБрмХрнН рммрм┐рм╖рнЯрм░рнЗ
More than a century after Reflections on Violence first appeared (1908) it remains a remarkably controversial essay. The concept of violence as a means to an end (social, religious, political or for aggrandisement) is hugely challenging as a philosophical subject - yet it is, of course, universally (and frequently) pursued.
The French thinker and political theorist Georges Sorel (1847-1922), fired up by his interest in Marxism and his anger at the injustice of the Dreyfus case, faced this challenge and in the seven chapters of Reflections on Violence he explored the question. It proved sufficiently stimulating over succeeding decades to be espoused by both Marxists and Fascists alike: class struggle, revolution and above all radical change were central to SorelтАЩs thought.
He acknowledges in his introduction: тАШ...the normal development of strikes has included a significant number of acts of violence; but certain learned sociologists seek to disguise a phenomenon that everyone who cares to use his eyes must have noticed.тАЩ Widely read (he regarded himself as self-educated), Sorel drew on many sources as he covered the ground, including Nietzsche, Proudhon, Marx, Eduard von Hartmann and Henri Bergson. He espoused a view of тАШmythтАЩ as a driving impetus - heroic acts by тАШa whole band of companionsтАЩ - for change. Confrontation cannot be avoided. It has been suggested that SorelтАЩs regard for unequivocal confrontation was based more on impassioned conviction than direct physical violence, but it may be difficult to slip this past his many calls for тАШdirect aggression'. He writes, тАШProletarian violence, carried on as a pure and simple manifestation of the sentiment of the class struggle, appears thus as a very fine and very heroic thing; it is at the service of the immemorial interests of civilisation; it is not perhaps the most appropriate method of obtaining immediate material advantages, but it may save the world from barbarism.тАЩ
Translation: T E Hulme.
The French thinker and political theorist Georges Sorel (1847-1922), fired up by his interest in Marxism and his anger at the injustice of the Dreyfus case, faced this challenge and in the seven chapters of Reflections on Violence he explored the question. It proved sufficiently stimulating over succeeding decades to be espoused by both Marxists and Fascists alike: class struggle, revolution and above all radical change were central to SorelтАЩs thought.
He acknowledges in his introduction: тАШ...the normal development of strikes has included a significant number of acts of violence; but certain learned sociologists seek to disguise a phenomenon that everyone who cares to use his eyes must have noticed.тАЩ Widely read (he regarded himself as self-educated), Sorel drew on many sources as he covered the ground, including Nietzsche, Proudhon, Marx, Eduard von Hartmann and Henri Bergson. He espoused a view of тАШmythтАЩ as a driving impetus - heroic acts by тАШa whole band of companionsтАЩ - for change. Confrontation cannot be avoided. It has been suggested that SorelтАЩs regard for unequivocal confrontation was based more on impassioned conviction than direct physical violence, but it may be difficult to slip this past his many calls for тАШdirect aggression'. He writes, тАШProletarian violence, carried on as a pure and simple manifestation of the sentiment of the class struggle, appears thus as a very fine and very heroic thing; it is at the service of the immemorial interests of civilisation; it is not perhaps the most appropriate method of obtaining immediate material advantages, but it may save the world from barbarism.тАЩ
Translation: T E Hulme.
рмПрм╣рм┐ рмЕрмбрм┐рмУрммрнБрмХрм░ рморнВрм▓рнНрнЯрм╛рмЩрнНрмХрми рмХрм░рмирнНрмдрнБ
рмЖрмкрмг рмХрмг рмнрм╛рммрнБрмЫрмирнНрмдрм┐ рмдрм╛рм╣рм╛ рмЖрмормХрнБ рмЬрмгрм╛рмирнНрмдрнБред
рм╢рнБрмгрм┐рмкрм╛рм░рнБрмерм┐рммрм╛ рмдрмернНрнЯ
рм╕рнНрморм╛рм░рнНрмЯрмлрнЛрми рмУ рмЯрм╛рммрм▓рнЗрмЯ
Google Play Books рмЖрмкрнНрмХрнБ, Android рмУ iPad/iPhone рмкрм╛рмЗрмБ рмЗрмирм╖рнНрмЯрм▓рнН рмХрм░рмирнНрмдрнБред рмПрм╣рм╛ рм╕рнНрм╡рмЪрм╛рм│рм┐рмд рмнрм╛рммрнЗ рмЖрмкрмгрмЩрнНрмХ рмЖрмХрм╛рмЙрмгрнНрмЯрм░рнЗ рм╕рм┐рмЩрнНрмХ рм╣рнЛтАНрмЗрмпрм┐рмм рмПрммрмВ рмЖрмкрмг рмпрнЗрмЙрмБрмарм┐ рмерм╛рмЖрмирнНрмдрнБ рмирм╛ рмХрм╛рм╣рм┐рмБрмХрм┐ рмЖрмирм▓рм╛рмЗрмирнН рмХрм┐рморнНрммрм╛ рмЕрмлрм▓рм╛рмЗрмирнНтАНрм░рнЗ рмкрнЭрм┐рммрм╛ рмкрм╛рмЗрмБ рмЕрмирнБрмормдрм┐ рмжрнЗрммред
рм▓рм╛рмкрмЯрмк рмУ рмХрморнНрмкрнНрнЯрнБрмЯрм░
рмирм┐рмЬрм░ рмХрморнНрмкрнНрнЯрнБрмЯрм░рнНтАНрм░рнЗ рмерм┐рммрм╛ рн▒рнЗрммрнН рммрнНрм░рм╛рмЙрмЬрм░рнНтАНрмХрнБ рммрнНрнЯрммрм╣рм╛рм░ рмХрм░рм┐ Google Playрм░рнБ рмХрм┐рмгрм┐рмерм┐рммрм╛ рммрм╣рм┐рмЧрнБрнЬрм┐рмХрнБ рмЖрмкрмг рмкрнЭрм┐рмкрм╛рм░рм┐рммрнЗред
