How to Talk About Atheism

This book is clearly a polemic against atheism. The publisher is a Christian evangelical company, that obviously sees atheism as a threat to the franchise. When you describe your book as "The atheist cannot justify the existence of the laws of logic, which means the atheist cannot be logical", you are demonstrating both a total lack of logic and an inability to be self-aware. Logic is not dictated by a book put together by the Council of Nicaea 1700 years ago, in which council members decided of the hundreds of myths and legends that had been handed down both about Jesus (none of the chosen ones were written by people who actually knew him) and about the Jewish heritage of murder and rapine, which should be 'gospel'. Logic has nothing to do with a Bible that is riddled with inconsistencies and contradictions, and has been mistranslated many times. And this attempt to proselytise to the atheist will undoubtedly backfire - as the writers' hate and fear get in the way of reality.

This is simply an instructional on how to fabricate a foundationally flawed, circular argument that has no hope of defending itself. If you are a spiritual person and wish to defend your faith in a genuine, intelligent way with well reasoned arguments and fair debate, this book will not help you at all. You will get owned. Every time. None of the interviews or conversations talked about in this book ever happened, guaranteed. Bearing false witness sems to be pretty common, ironically.

Attempting to confuse others on a subject by misleading them and distorting or improvising facts isn't how functional people make rational arguments, so readers can assume that you are not. Saying things that are untrue undermines any validity to be found in your argument, if any at all.