The core argument proposes the development of “particularist political principles” as a solution, providing an ethical framework for adjudicating difference without relying on universal norms. Drawing on moral particularism, the book demonstrates how contingent, context-dependent reasoning can resolve issues of representation and pluralism in democracy while avoiding the pitfalls of both universalism and discriminatory practices.
This research is relevant for scholars of political theory exploring new approaches to grounding pluralism and difference in contemporary democratic thought.
Ivane Lomidze, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia, and the University of Münster, Münster, Germany.